In First Appeal No. 6 of 2000, the High Court of Judicature at Bilaspur dismissed the appeal as withdrawn upon hearing the appellant's prayer for withdrawal supported by an affidavit.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn; the interim application for withdrawal was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
’ ’ ’ i "Wkli‘la
,
V r I l
clFln!!!‘|)“o|ole|a47“|
\J /
rzg;gm
‘ IN TEE HIGH COURT‘uF JUDICATURE AT BILA$PUR(CEHIATTISGARI—i) First Appeal No . 6 of V2000 ( Memorandum of First Appeal U/Se‘ction 96 of CPC ) APPELLANT o Surya Kumar Bajpai S/o Prabhakar Datt DEFENDANT NO ¢1 Bajpai, agedr 35 years,cu1tivator, resident of Bijapura District Bastar VerSus ® R§.SPONDE:¢¥S 1. State Bank of vlndia,BackW§y PLAINTIFF Reclamation ,Medam Gama Road» @‘EFENDANT No§ Nariman Point Bombay (Central 2__to4 Office) through Branch Manager. Branch Bijapur,Tahsil Bijapur District Bastar (Chhattis‘garh) (PLAINTIFF ) Ganesh Datt Bajyai S/o Diwakar Datt' Bajpai.aged 32 years, cultivator; r/o Bhattipara, Bijapur ,District Bastar . Smt. Shiv Dulari Bajpai wd/o Prabhakar Datt Bajpaioaged 60 years¢ Bhattipara 9Bijapur, Dis trict Bastar (Chhattisgarh). Moolchand S/o Manaklal Lukad , aged , aged aged 3 2 years , ,businessman” resident of Bhattipara,Bijapur.Dis trict trict B as tar tar (duhattisgarh ) . (DEFENDANT Nos 2 To 4) ————.—..._,MEMORANDUM OF FIRST APPEAL UMER————-—.._____.SECTION 96 OF C.PaCo
Moolchand S/o Manaklal Lukad , aged , aged aged 3 2 years , ,businessman” resident of Bhattipara,Bijapur.Dis trict trict B as tar tar (duhattisgarh ) . (DEFENDANT Nos 2 To 4)
Xl-HC-78
l
anéwmiém
’
ammmmim
I
02.09.2005
5hri H.5. Pmei, coun
‘This
is an apblicafion f r wifhdrawal of 1'his F.A. No. 6 of 2000.
Heard 5hri Pafel on 1'h s in‘lerim applioaiion.
Learned counsel for- T e appellan‘r submifs fhai' for fhe reason
.
s’ra‘red in fhe interim applica fio‘n, now fhe appellan'r does no? wan? lo
prosecui'e fhis appeal and iii may be dismissed asjwi‘rhdrawn. This
infer-im applicafion is suppo “led wifh an affidavif of Surya Kumar
Bajpai/appeiiant The same is allowed.
‘
Sd/-
The appeal is dismiséec as wifhdrawn.
Sunil Kurnar Sinha
Judge
/
.
\g
Surya Kumar Bajpai
State Bank of India
Ganesh Datt Bajpai
Smt. Shiv Dulari Bajpai
Moolchand S/o Manaklal Lukad
Sunil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
