Cgit award
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim procedural orders listing five EPF tribunal appeals for arguments. Matters adjourned to specific dates due to pending replies, absent counsel, or new applications.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 2 DELHI
Item No. 01
D-2/12/2024 M/s Shreya Construction vs. APFC/RPFC, Meerut.
Present: Sh. Prakash Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
Order dated-10.09.2025
Respondent has filed reply of the application under section 7-O of the EPF & MP Act, 1952. Copy furnished to appellant’s counsel. However, it is a matter of record that appeal still has not been entertained because an application for condonation of delay has to be decided. Respondent seeks time for filing of the reply. Put up for filing of reply on the application for condonation of delay on 26.09.2025. Till then, interim order is continued.
Atul Kumar Garg
(Presiding Officer)
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 2 DELHI
Item No. 02
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Shreya Construction
- respondent
APFC/RPFC, Meerut
- appellant
M/s Origo Commodities India Pvt. Ltd.
- respondent
APFC/RPFC Gurugram East 2
- appellant
M/s Fluor Projects Inc.
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court