Cgit award
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Rule 7(2) of the EPF & MP Act, 1952, accepting the submission regarding delayed receipt of orders post-insolvency. The matter was listed for further hearing.
What did the court decide?
Application for condonation of delay allowed; matter listed for stay application; interim order continues till next hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, DELHI
D-1/44/2023 M/s. Sumitra International vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi (West)
Present:
Sh. Sauhardya Biswas, proxy counsel for the Appellant.
Ms. Swati Surhatia, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
Order dated-18.09.2025
Proxy counsel for appellant submits that his main counsel is not available due to the reason he has to go to a condolence meeting. The case is adjourned for 19.09.2025. In the meanwhile, interim order to continue till then.
Atul Kumar Garg
(Presiding Officer)
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM
LABOUR COURT, DELHI
D-1/46/2023 M/s SMS Prayavaran Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi (North).
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal by the Resolution Professional should be condoned considering the delay in receiving the impugned orders.
Whether the appointment of a new Managing Director provides a sufficient cause to condone the delay.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s SMS Prayavaran Ltd.
- respondent
APFC/RPFC, Delhi (North)
Coram
Atul Kumar Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court