Cgit award
Case brief
What is this about?
The Central Government Industrial Tribunal listed multiple pending appeals arising under the EPF & MP Act, 1952. The orders dated 10.09.2025 addressed scheduling for arguments, fixing dates for file replies and rejoinders, and granting adjournments due to absence of senior counsel or procedural delays. Matters were listed for future dates ranging from September to November 2025.
What did the court decide?
Orders fixing dates for arguments, filing of rejoinders and replies, and granting specific adjournments to further dates in November 2025 depending on the matter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 1 DELHI
Item No. 01
D-1/55/2024 M/s Imperia Structures Limited vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi (East).
Present: Sh. Raj Kumar, Proxy Counsel for the appellant. Sh. Vaibhav Prasad, AR for the respondent.
Order dated-10.09.2025
Counsel for both the parties are not present, let this matter be listed for 26.09.2025 for argument on the application under section 7-O of the EPF & MP Act, 1952.
Atul Kumar Garg
(Presiding Officer)
At 1:40 PM-
Sh. S.N Mahanta, Ld. Counsel for the respondent has appeared and he is apprised about the proceedings.
Atul Kumar Garg
(Presiding Officer)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant adjournments, issue notices, or list matters for argument in pending appeals under the EPF & MP Act.
How to handle procedural irregularities regarding counsel appearance and filing of replies.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Imperia Structures Limited
- respondent
APFC/RPFC, Delhi (East)
- appellant
M/s Sawhney Rubber Industries
- respondent
APFC/RPFC, Delhi (East)
- appellant
M/s Mahle Filters Systems (Ind.) Ltd.
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court