Cgit award
Case brief
What is this about?
A presiding officer of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal lists and disposes of five apprenticeship dispute matters on an adjourned date. Orders include transferring requests into official records, postponing hearings, and appointing successors. One order directs the respondent to explain details under section 7A of the EPF Act. Another emphasizes final arguments ex-parte if the appellant
What did the court decide?
Orders to inform tribunal of jurisdiction transfer, grant time for record tracing, list for final arguments, finalize ex-parte, and explain allowance details under Section 7A of EPF Act.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 1 DELHI
D-1/17/2024 M/s Micromax Informatics Ltd. Vs. APFC/RPFC Delhi North
Present: None for the appellant.
Sh. Yash Narayan, proxy counsel for Sh. Rajesh Kumar, ld. Counsel for the respondent.
Order dated-01.09.2025
Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent seeks further two weeks time to get instructions from the RPFC West regarding the impugned order. According to him this case along with other cases has been transferred from Delhi North to Delhi West, however, this tribunal has been kept in dark while transferring these cases to the jurisdiction of one RPFC to another. Therefore, Addl. CPFC Delhi Zone is directed to inform this tribunal about the transfer of cases from one jurisdiction to another. The same be informed to this tribunal by moving amended memo of parties by the respondent counsel in each case so that necessary corrections can be made and the communications from this tribunal can be sent to the concerned RPFC having the jurisdiction of those cases. Report shall be submitted within two weeks. Put up on 18.09.2025. In the meanwhile, interim orders, if any to continue till next date of hearing.
Atul Kumar Garg
(Presiding Officer)
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, DELHI
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether circumstances regarding jurisdiction transfer or missing records justify granting time adjournments and directing departmental inquiries.
Whether an adjudicating officer can finalize an appeal ex-parte if the appellant fails to appear after being given notice and opportunity.
How to handle cases where record is missing, parties are absent, or writ petitions are pending in higher courts.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Micromax Informatics Ltd.
- respondent
APFC/RPFC Delhi North
- appellant
M/s. United Coffee House
- respondent
APFC/ RPFC Delhi (Central)
- appellant
M/s. Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court