Sh. Mange Ram v. MCD
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal allowed a claim for arrears of wages under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Based on the management's admittance, the claimant was awarded Rs. 2,84,394/-.
What did the court decide?
The claimant is entitled to Rs. 2,84,394/- which the management is directed to pay within 30 days. Failure to pay attracts 6% interest.
What the court decided
1
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT DELHI-1, ROOM NO.207, ROUSE AVENUE COURT COMPLEX, NEW DELHI
LCA NO. 957/2024
Sh. Mange Ram S/o Sh. Kirpa Ram, Through Sh. Abhinav Kumar, C-240, Ist Floor, Jhilmil Colony Delhi-110095.
…Claimant
Versus
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi Dr. S.P. Mukherjee Civic Center Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Minto Road, Delhi-110002.
…Management
Shri Abhinav Kumar, A/R, for the claimant Shri. Naveen Kumar, A/R for the management
ORDER
An application was moved by Sh. Mange Ram S/o Sh. Kirpa Ram, the claimant, under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the Act) with the averments that he joined service with the management as Safai Karamchari. he was treated as daily wager employee and was paid wages as fixed and revised from time to time under the Minimum Wages Act. he was thereafter regularized on the said post retrospectively with effect from 2003. Since then, the claimant was serving the management to the entire satisfaction of the seniors. Arrear of Rs. 9,44,845/- were not paid to the claimant.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the claimant is entitled to arrears of wages for which the management has made a categorical admission under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Whether interest is payable on the admitted arrears if payment is not made within the stipulated period.
Coram
Vikas Kunvar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court