Smt. Leelavati v. MCD
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal allowed a claim for arrears of wages under Section 33-C(2) after the management admitted the liability of Rs. 5,46,660/- in its written statement.
What did the court decide?
The management is directed to pay Rs. 5,46,660/- within 30 days, failing which to pay interest @6% from the date of the order.
What the court decided
1
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT DELHI-1, ROOM NO.207, ROUSE AVENUE COURT COMPLEX, NEW DELHI
LCA NO. 346/2024
Smt. Leelavati W/o Sh. Sunil Kumar, Through Sh. Abhinav Kumar, C-240, Ist Floor, Jhilmil Colony Delhi-110095.
…Claimant
Versus
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi Dr. S.P. Mukherjee Civic Center Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Minto Road, Delhi-110002.
…Management
Shri Abhinav Kumar, A/R, for the claimant Shri. Devendra Kumar, A/R for the management
ORDER
An application was moved by Smt. Leelavati W/o Sh. Sunil Kumar, the claimant, under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the Act) with the averments that she joined service with the management as Safai Karamchari. she was treated as daily wager employee and was paid wages as fixed and revised from time to time under the Minimum Wages Act. she was thereafter regularized on the said post retrospectively with effect from 2004. Since then, the claimant was serving the management to the entire satisfaction of the seniors. Arrear of Rs. 9,33,621/- were not paid to the claimant.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a claimant entitled to arrears of wages is entitled to the amount admitted by the employer under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Coram
Justice Vikas Kunvar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court