The Tribunal allowed the claimant's application for arrears of salary and emoluments totaling Rs. 5,61,476/- claimed under Section 33-C(2) of the ID Act, following ex-parte evidence against the Municipal Corporation of Delhi management.
Payment of Rs. 5,61,476/- within 30 days plus 6% interest from filing date if not paid within.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT DELHI – 1, ROOM NO.207, ROUSE AVENUE COURT COMPLEX, NEW DELHI
LCA NO. 251/ 2022
Sh. Mahak Singh S/o Sh. Nirmal Singh, Through Authorized Representative, C/o Aggarwal Bhawan, G.T. Road, Tis Hazari, Delhi 110054 Claimant
Versus
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi Dr. S.P. Mukherjee Civic Center Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Minto Road, Delhi- 110002 Management
Shri Rajiv Agarwal, A/R, for the claimant None for the management
ORDER
1
cross examination of the workman witness. The cross examination of the workman witness was treated as nil. Workman evidence was thereafter closed. Management neither appeared nor led evidence. The management evidence was closed.
Justice Vikas Kunvar Srivastava
Presiding Officer Retired Judge of High Court of Allahabad November 08, 2024
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the claimant is entitled to payment of arrears of salary, matric/non-matric, 1st MACP, and 7th CPC difference totaling Rs. 5,61,476/-.
Whether interest at 18% per annum can be awarded in a petition u/s 33-C(2) of the ID Act.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vikas Kunvar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
An application to a Labour Court, most commonly under section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 for computation of money due to a workman.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
