The Tribunal allowed the petitioner's claim for arrears of salary and allowances totaling Rs. 7,28,729/- under Section 33-C(2) of the ID Act, remitting the matter as ex-parte. The claim for interest at 18% was denied, though 6% interest is awarded for delayed payment.
Award of Rs. 7,28,729/- payable within 30 days with 6% interest thereafter; 18% claimed interest denied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT DELHI – 1, ROOM NO.207, ROUSE AVENUE COURT COMPLEX, NEW DELHI
LCA NO. 240/ 2022
Smt. Anita W/o Sh. Ravinder Kumar, Through Authorized Representative, C/o Aggarwal Bhawan, G.T. Road, Tis Hazari, Delhi 110054 Claimant
Versus
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi Dr. S.P. Mukherjee Civic Center Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Minto Road, Delhi- 110002 Management
Shri Rajiv Agarwal, A/R for the claimant None for the management
ORDER
Workman evidence was thereafter closed. Management neither appeared nor led evidence. The management evidence was closed.
Justice Vikas Kunvar Srivastava Presiding Officer Retired Judge of High Court of Allahabad November 08, 2024
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to claim arrears of difference of salary, arrears of matric/non-matric, arrears of 1st MACP, and difference of salary due to 7th CPC amounting to Rs. 7,28,729/-.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to claim interest @ 18% per annum on the awarded amount.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Union of India vs. Presiding Officer CGITReferred¶12
Union of India vs. Presiding Officer CGIT in 1984 AISLJ 567
King Airways vs. Captain Manjit SinghReferred¶12
King Airways vs. Captain Manjit Singh decided in WPC No. 2666 of 2010
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Anita W/o Sh. Ravinder Kumar
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Vikas Kunvar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
An application to a Labour Court, most commonly under section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 for computation of money due to a workman.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Vikas Kunvar Srivastava
Parties & counsel
