Claimant claimed arrears of salary and interest. Tribunal allowed salary difference of Rs. 13,35,778 but rejected interest prayer, directing 6% interest only if payment delayed.
Rs. 13,35,778 allowed with 6% interest if not paid within 30 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT DELHI – 1, ROOM NO.207, ROUSE AVENUE COURT COMPLEX, NEW DELHI
LCA NO. 193/ 2018
Sh. Pardeep S/o Sh. Mahender, Through General Secretary, Municipal Employees Union, Aggarwal Bhawan, G.T. Road, Tis Hazari, Delhi 110054 Claimant
Versus
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi Dr. S.P. Mukherjee Civic Center Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Minto Road, Delhi- 110002 Management
Shri Rajiv Agarwal, A/R for the claimant Shri Harbans Kaushal, A/R for the management
ORDER
WW1/1 to Ex WW1/4. No one turned up from the management side for cross examination of the workman witness. The cross examination of the workman witness was treated as nil. Workman evidence was thereafter closed. Management neither appeared nor led evidence. The management evidence was closed.
Justice Vikas Kunvar Srivastava Presiding Officer Retired Judge of High Court of Allahabad November 08, 2024
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the workman entitled to difference of salary from date of regularization.
Whether the Tribunal has power to award interest on salary arrears under Section 33C(2).
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Union of India vs. Presiding Officer CGITReferred¶12
Union of India vs. Presiding Officer CGIT in 1984 AISLJ 567
King Airways vs. Captain Manjit SinghReferred¶12
King Airways vs. Captain Manjit Singh decided in WPC No. 2666 of 2010
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vikas Kunvar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
An application to a Labour Court, most commonly under section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 for computation of money due to a workman.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Vikas Kunvar Srivastava
Parties & counsel
