Tribunal passed a No Dispute/Claim award in a reference regarding a plea for compassionate appointment. The claimant union failed to file a claim statement or appear despite notice, leading the Tribunal to conclude the workman was not interested in adjudication.
No Dispute/Claim award passed and sent to appropriate Government for publication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT DELHI - 1, NEW DELHI.
ID No. 162/2023
Sh. Mukesh S/o Late Sh. Prahalad, Rept. by Delhi Municipal Mazdoor Trade Union, B-40, MCD Flats, Bulward Road, Tis Hazari-110006.
Workman…
Versus
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, Dr. S.P. Mukherjee, Civic Centre, J.L. Nehru Marg, New Delhi-110002.
Management…
AWARD
In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide letter No. L-42011/85/2023 (IR(DU)) dated 04.07.2023 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Act, for adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under:
The Schedule
“ Whether demands of Shri Mukesh S/o Late Sh. Prahalad through Municipal Mazdoor Trade Union, Delhi vide letter dated nil and received on 01.11.2021 to the management of Municipal Corporation of Delhi, New Delhi (earlier East Delhi Municipal Corporation (EDMC)) for appointment on compassionate ground on any suitable post on regular and permanent basis (instead of on contract basis) in proper pay scale and allowances with the retrospective effect from the date of death of his father or from the date of his application and further regularize him from the initial date of joining as per policy along with all consequential benefits, are proper, legal, justified and devoid of unreasonable delay? If yes, what reliefs as sought vide letter under reference are the disputant entitled to and what directions, if any, are necessary in this respect?”
1
Justice Vikas Kunvar Srivastava Retired Judge, Allahabad High Court Presiding Officer
Date: 07.11.2024
2
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mukesh S/o Late Sh. Prahalad
Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Vikas Kunvar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
An industrial dispute referred to a Central Government Industrial Tribunal by the appropriate government under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
