Dismissed

Id No. 132 to 136 of 2022 of Smt. Sonal Kaushik v. Trai & Anr.

CGIT2 Sept 2024ID No. 132 to 136 of 2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal dismissed five claims for illegal termination filed under Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act by different claimants. The claims were disposed of as withdrawn because the claimant's counsel filed a submission requesting withdrawal.

What did the court decide?

The claims for illegal termination were dismissed as withdrawn upon the submission of the claimant's counsel.

Id No. 132 to 136 of 2022 of Smt. Sonal Kaushik Vs… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | CGIT (2024)

¶1

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUMLABOUR COURT NO-II, NEW DELHI

¶2

I.D. No. 132/2022

¶3

Smt. Sonal Kaushik, W/o SH. Pankaj,

¶4

R/o-1164, Sector-19, Faridabad, Haryana-121002.

¶5

I.D. No. 133/2022

¶6

Sh. Ishant Garg, S/o Sh. Narender Garg,

¶7

R/o-C1/17, Near MC Bharti School, Sanjay Enclave, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059.

¶8

I.D. No. 134/2022

¶9

Sh. Kapil Kumar, S/o Late Sh. Roshan Singh, R/o-28, 11-J Near Park, PGIMS Campus, Rohtak, Haryana-124001.

¶10

I.D. No. 135/2022

¶11

Sh. Anmol Gupta, S/o Late Sh. R.K. Gupta, R/o- B-175, 02^nd Floor, B-Block, Lajpat Nagar-01, New Delhi-110024.

¶12

I.D. No. 136/2022

¶13

Sh. Dinesh Chander, S/o Sh. Kewala Nand Bhagat, R/o 193-194, 03^rd Floor, G-30, Sector-03, Rohini, New Delhi-110085.

¶14

Through- Indian National Migrant Worker’s Union, 1770/8, 3^rd Floor, Govind Puri Extn. Main Road, Kalkaji,

¶15

Versus

¶16

1. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Mahanagar Doorsanchar Bhawan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Next to Zakir Hussain College, New Delhi-110002.

¶17

2. The CEO, Huawei Telecommunication (India) Pvt. Ltd., A-16, Mohan Co-Operative Industrial Estate, New Delhi-110044.

¶18

Appearance:-

¶19

For Claimants: Sh. Rakesh Sharma, Ld. AR For Management: None for M-1

¶20

Sh. Anurag Lakhotia and Sh. Mohit Sehrawat, Ld. AR’s for M-2

¶21

AWARD

¶22

These are five applications of U/S 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act (here in after is referred as an Act) filed by the different claimants for their illegal termination.

¶23

Counsel of the workmen submits that he wants to withdraw the present claims. His statement is recorded separately.

¶24

In view of the above submission made by AR of the claimants, these claims stand dismissed as withdrawn. Awards are accordingly passed. A copy of this award is sent to appropriate government for notification under section 17 of the I.D. Act. Files are consigned to record room.

¶25

Date: 02.09.2024

¶26

ATUL KUMAR GARG Presiding Officer. CGIT-cum-Labour Court-II

Id No. 132 to 136 of 2022 of Smt. Sonal Kaushik v. Trai & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Id No. 132 to 136 of 2022 of Smt. Sonal Kaushik v. Trai & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Id No. 207 of 2019 of Sh. Mahender Pal Singh Vs Cpwd

Id No. 47 of 2018 of Sh. Satbir Singh Vs B.W.F.S

Id No. 57 of 2022 of Sh. Ravinder Singh Vs Area Building Complex & Anr.

Id No. 41 of 2019 of Sh. Satish Kumar Vs Esic & Ors.

Id No. 85 of 2022 of Sh. Sunil Kumar Vs N.C.C.F

Id No. 67 of 2015 of Sh. Manoj Kumar Vs Fsi & Ors.

Id No. 220 of 2021 of Sh. Jaipal Singh Vs Cpwd & Ors.

Id No. 101 of 2015 of Sh. The General Secretary Vs Bwfs & Anr.