Disposed

Manzoor Ahmad Khoker v. Power Development Department

CAT15 Sept 2026O.A./647/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the Original Application directing respondents to treat it as a representation regarding the applicant's pension and retirement benefits claim. A direction was issued for a detailed, reasoned order to be passed within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent to treat the application as a representation, consider claims for pension and retirement benefits, and pass a speaking order within eight weeks.

Manzoor Ahmad Khoker vs Power Development Department — Pension and Retirement Benefits | CAT (2026)

OA 647 OF 2026

ITEM 41

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL SRINAGAR BENCH, SRINAGAR O.A. 647/2026

¶5

Date of Order: 15^th September, 2026

¶6

C O R A M

¶7

HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU TAGORE, MEMBER(JUDL.)

¶8

Manzoor Ahmad Khoker (Aged 62 years) S/o: Habib-Ullah Khoker R/O: H.No. 38-3 Baderkote Tanghdar Karnah District Kupwara-193225.

¶9

……Applicant

¶10

By Advocate : Mr. N A Beigh Through VC

¶11

VERSUS

¶12

Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir through Commissioner/ Secretary to Govt. Power Development Department Civil Sectt. Srinagar/ Jammu 190001.

¶13

J&K Power Development Corporation through its Managing Director, Exhibition Ground Srinagar190001. 3. Chief Engineer, Generation Wing Power Development Corporation Bemina, Srinagar-190001.

¶14

Executive Engineer, Power Development Corporation Division Karnah District Kupwara.

¶15

Principal Accountant General (A&E) J&K Opposite Civil Sectt. Srinagar/ Jammu 190001.

¶16

Senior Accounts Officer, (PNR-3) office of Accountant General (A&E) J&K opposite Civil Sectt. Srinagar/ Jammu 190001.

¶17

Director Finance J&K Power Development Corporation, Exhibition Ground Srinagar-190001. ..….Respondents

¶18

By Advocate :-

¶19

Mr. Rais Ud Din Ganaie, DAG for R1-R4 Mr. Mubashir Majid Malik for R5&R6

¶20

Digitally signed by Devendra Tripathi DN: CN=Devendra Tripathi, E= [email protected] Reason: I am the author of this document Location: Date: 2026.09.16 13:30:03+05'30' Foxit PDF Reader Version: 2026.1.1

Devendra Tripathi

OA 647 OF 2026

ITEM 41

O R D E R (ORAL) JUSTICE RITU TAGORE, MEMBER [JUDL.]

¶26

01. The matter was listed today for filing of reply. Reply has

¶27

been filed by respondent Nos. 5 and 6. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the applicant, after arguing the matter for some time, submits that the interests of

¶28

justice would be adequately served if the present Original

¶29

Application is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to treat the same as a representation and consider the applicant's claims for finalization and sanction of his pension and for release/disbursement of all pensionary and retiral benefits due and payable to him, including gratuity, leave salary and other consequential retirement benefits, together with the documents annexed thereto, strictly in accordance with law and within a stipulated period.

¶30

02. Mr. Rais-ud-Din Ganie, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 4, and Mr. Mubashir Majid Malik, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 5 and 6, submit that the present Original

Devendra Tripathi

OA 647 OF 2026

ITEM 41

Application may be disposed of with appropriate directions, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the respective respondents.

¶37

03. The case of the applicant, as projected in the present Original Application, is that despite the lapse of more than one year from the date of his retirement, the respondents have failed to release the retiral/pensionary benefits due and payable to him, including pension, gratuity, leave salary and other consequential retirement benefits. It is stated that the applicant has repeatedly approached the respondents for release of the aforesaid dues, but the same continue to be withheld without any justification.

¶38

04. The applicant submits that, being a senior citizen without any regular source of income after retirement, he is dependent upon the retiral benefits for his sustenance and medical needs and that the non-payment thereof has caused financial hardship to him and his family. It is further contended that pension and retiral benefits are valuable statutory rights and cannot be withheld except in

Devendra Tripathi

OA 647 OF 2026

ITEM 41

accordance with law. The applicant has also relied upon the legal position regarding timely finalization and release of pensionary and retiral benefits.

¶45

05. The applicant has assailed the action/inaction of the respondents, inter alia, on the ground that he has a statutory right to pension and retiral benefits; that such benefits cannot be withheld without following the procedure prescribed by law; that the non-release of the retiral dues for more than one year is arbitrary and unreasonable and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; and that despite his retirement, the respondents have failed to discharge their obligation to settle and release the retiral benefits payable to him. It is further stated that no order or communication assigning any reason for withholding the said benefits has been

¶46

issued to him.

¶47

06. The applicant states that he submitted a representation

¶48

dated 10.06.2026 before the respondents, projecting his

¶49

grievances, but the same has not been considered or acted

Devendra Tripathi

OA 647 OF 2026

ITEM 41

upon. It is also stated that the present Original Application

¶56

has been filed for the first time in respect of the present cause of action and that no other case concerning the same cause of action is pending before any other Court or Tribunal.

¶57

07. Having considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material placed on record, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the present Original Application pending, particularly in view of the limited prayer made on behalf of the applicant.

¶58

08. Accordingly, in view of the limited prayer made on behalf

¶59

of the applicant, this Tribunal, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case or the rival claims of the parties, deems it appropriate to dispose of the present Original Application with a direction to the respondents to treat the present Original Application as a representation

¶60

and accord due consideration to the applicant's claims for

¶61

finalization and sanction of his pension and for

Devendra Tripathi

OA 647 OF 2026

ITEM 41

release/disbursement of all pensionary and retiral benefits due and payable to him, including gratuity, leave salary and other consequential retirement benefits, together with the documents annexed thereto, strictly in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations and the law governing the field.

¶68

09. The respondents shall thereafter pass a detailed, reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon

¶69

them.

¶70

10. In case the applicant is found entitled to any of the benefits claimed by him, the respondents shall ensure release of such admissible benefits in accordance with law, within a further period of four (04) weeks from the date of passing of the aforesaid order.

¶71

11. It is made clear that this Tribunal has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the applicant's claim, and all questions of fact and law are left open to be considered by

¶72

the competent authority while passing the aforesaid order.

Devendra Tripathi

7 OA 647 OF 2026

ITEM 41

12. With the aforesaid directions, the Original Application

¶78

stands disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s),

¶79

if any, shall also stand disposed of.

¶80

13. No order as to costs.

¶81

14. Registry shall consign the record to the Record Room

¶82

after due compliance.

¶83

(JUSTICE RITU TAGORE)
Member (Judl.)
15-09-2026
DEVENDRA TRIPATHI

¶84

Digitally signed by Devendra Tripathi DN: CN=Devendra Tripathi, E= Devendra [email protected] Reason: I am the author of this document Location: Date: 2026.09.16 13:30:03+05'30' Tripathi Foxit PDF Reader Version: 2026.1.1

Manzoor Ahmad Khoker v. Power Development Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manzoor Ahmad Khoker v. Power Development Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arif Ramzan Parray vs General Administrative Department

Mohammad Shafi Sofi vs Health and Medical Education Department

Subhan Ali vs Department of Posts

Ravi Kant Pandey vs Department of Defence Production

Suraj Bhan vs Ordnance Factory

Firdous Ahmad Giri vs Home Department

K K Umadevi vs the General Manager Southern Railway Hq Office Park Town Chennai

Mahesh Kumar vs General Manager, N E Rly