The applicant (a Divisional Engineer) sought relief regarding promotion benefits and proforma benefits. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel requested a withdrawal of the original petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the OA accordingly.
Allowed withdrawal of OA with liberty to file fresh OA; OA dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OA 310/00537/2015
1
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHENNAI BENCH
OA/310/00537/2015
Dated Monday the 1st day of April Two Thousand Twenty Four
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. VARUN SINDHU KUL KAUMUDI, Member (A) & HON'BLE MR. M. SWAMINATHAN, Member (J)
S. Padmanabhan Senior Divisional Engineer/Works Chennai Division Southern Railway.
… Applicant
By Advocate M/s. Ratio Legis
Vs
By Advocate Mr. R. S. Krishnaswamy
OA 310/00537/2015
2
ORAL ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi, Member(A))
In the instant OA, the applicant seeks the following relief:
applicant, the applicant is permitted to withdraw the OA with liberty to file fresh OA if so advised.
(M. Swaminathan) (Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi) Member(J) Member (A)
01.04.2024
AS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Padmanabhan
Union of India rep. by The Secretary Ministry for State (Railways) Rail Bhavan, New Delhi
The General Manager Southern Railway Park Town, Chennai
The Chief Personnel Officer Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai
VARUN SINDHU KUL KAUMUDI
M. SWAMINATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
An original application before a tribunal, most commonly a service dispute before the Central or a State Administrative Tribunal.
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
