solution was , one of the reason if any false complaint under any draconian legislation were made, the statute itself do not contain any methodology by which a falsity of the complaint can be expiated and expressed machinery which is required in case of such falsity was also left vague or blank. This was probably done due to the plea that victim of such alleged infraction may not be capable of calculatingly modulated in such scene where they can don the mantle of a victim even though not a victim, but will extract benefit out of fear of the alleged perpetrator, a law becomes draconian when ever the law Is capable of such misuse , instead of being used by the society, it provided a platform for abuse. 28. Coming back to Act 14 of 2013, it was enacted out of necessity and Visakha judgement which narrated the methodology-to provide for protection against sexual harassment to women. It was intended to eliminate on all fours any discrimination against women. As the Government found that when a women is sexually harassed, her right under Article 14 and 15 and right to live v/ith dignity under Article 21 is violated. It recognises that she has a right to safe environment free from sexual harassment. Under Section 2(m) sexual harassment was defined as an unwelcome physical contact and advances and unwelcome demand for sexual favours, making sexually colourable remarks, shov/ing porno and any other unwelcome physical, verbal, non-verbal conduct of sexual nature. These have been paramateria noted, the notion of unwelcome act, as we need to say that human race will cease to exist from that moment onwards on the definition of this unwelcome act which is crux of the issue as found by the Parliament of India. Vide Seclon 4 an internal committee is formulated, wherein it provided that presiding officer shall be a woman at senior level. It also provided if such a womenjsjTot available, then such presiding officer will be nominated from other offices
