Appellant filed Excise Appeal No. 86990 of 2017 challenging an order related to service tax. During hearing, appellant's counsel prayed for withdrawal of the appeal as refund claim was sanctioned by the department. The court allowed withdrawal and dismissed the appeal accordingly.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn by appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TA X APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
REGIONAL BENCH - COURT NO. I
Excise Appeal No. 86990 of 2017
(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. PUN-EXCUS-001-APP-38-17-18 dated - 27.04.2017 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals-I), Central Excise, Pune)
Finolex Cable Ltd .… Appellant 26-27, Mumbai-Pune Road, Pimri, Pune- 411 018.
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise and …. Respondent Service Tax, Pune-I
ICE House, 41-A, Sassoon Road, Opposite Wadia College, Pune- 411 001.
APPEARANCE:
Shri Bhadresh Vyas, Chartered Accountant for the Appellant Shri A.K. Shrivastava, Authorized Representative for the Respondent
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. S.K. MOHANTY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) HON’BLE MR. M.M. PARTHIBAN, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
FINAL ORDER NO. A/85210/2026
Date of Hearing: 22.01.2026 Date of Decision: 22.01.2026
Per: S.K. MOHANTY
Heard both sides.
(S.K. Mohanty) Member (Judicial)
(M.M. Parthiban) Member (Technical)
SM
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Finolex Cable Ltd.
Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Pune-I
S.K. MOHANTY
M.M. PARTHIBAN
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal in a central excise matter before CESTAT.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
