In a customs miscellaneous application arising from an appeal, the tribunal allowed the application on the ground that the underlying appeal was withdrawn by the respondent.
Miscellaneous application allowed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
WEST ZONAL BENCH
CUSTOMS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.85820 OF 2024
IN
CUSTOMS APPEAL No.85651 OF 2015
[Arising out of order-in-appeal no.MUM-CUSTM-PREV-APP-465 To 490/14-15 dated 17th October 2014 passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai-III]
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREV.)MUMBAI Appellant
New Custom House, Ballard Estate, Mumbai-400001
Vs.
KEMICO SALES CORPORATION
- 21,Mahavir Chambers, 3rd Floor, Mumbai400 003
Respondent
Appearance: Present for the Appellant :None Present for the Respondent: Shri K.M.Azad, Asstt.Commissioner (AR)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR C J MATHEW, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) HON’BLE MR AJAY SHARMA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
DATE OF HEARING/DECISON: 16.01.2026
FINAL ORDER NO. 85212 /2025
PER: CORAM
Application is allowed. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Dictated and Pronounced in Open Court)
(AJAY SHARMA) (C J MATHEW) Member (Judicial) Member (Technical)
mk
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREV.) MUMBAI
KEMICO SALES CORPORATION
MATHEW
AJAY SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal in a customs matter before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
