The Appellant-Tribunal allowed the appeal in Central Excise Appeal No. 20829 of 2016 by remanding the matter. No facts or legal grounds were detailed in this judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE
REGIONAL BENCH - COURT NO. 1
Central Excise Appeal No. 20829 of 2016
(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. 07-10/2016 dated 29.02.2016 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bengaluru II Commissionerate, Bengaluru.)
M/s. Margo Bio Controls Pvt. Ltd.,
Appellant(s)
Plot No. 64, Antharasanahalli Industrial Area, Tumkur – 572 101.
VERSUS
Commissioner of Central
Excise, Bangalore – I, C.R. Buildings, Queen’s Road, P.B.No: 5400, Bangalore – 560 001.
Respondent(s)
APPEARANCE:
Mr. V. Raghuraman, Senior Advocate with Mr. Raghavendra C.R. Advocate and Ms. Sneha. J.P. Chartered Accountant for the Appellant.
Mr. Vikalp Jain, Superintendent (AR) for the Respondent.
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. D.M. MISRA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) HON'BLE MRS R. BHAGYA DEVI, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
DATE OF HEARING: 16.01.2026 DATE OF DECISION: 16.01.2026
The appeal is allowed by way of remand. For order, see order of date in Central Excise Appeal No. 20828 of 2016.
(D.M. MISRA) MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
(R. BHAGYA DEVI) MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
RV
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Margo Bio Controls Pvt. Ltd.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore – I
D.M. Misra
R. Bhagia Devi
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal in a central excise matter before CESTAT.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
