The Appellate Tribunal dismissed an excise appeal in default for non-prosecution as the appellant was unrepresented and appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
WEST ZONAL BENCH
EXCISE APPEAL NO.89482 OF 2013
[Arising out of order-in-appeal no. NSK-EXCUS-000-APP-239-13-14 dated 23rd August 2013 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Nashik]
IIC LIMITED
5th Floor, Tower-B, Worldmark-1, Aero city, New Delhi-110037
Appellant
Vs.
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX-NASHIK Respondent
Appearance:
Present for the Appellant : None Present for the Respondent: Shri P.K.Acharya(AR)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR C J MATHEW, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) HON’BLE MR AJAY SHARMA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
FINAL ORDER NO.86034 /2025
DATE OF HEARING/DECISON: 01.07.2025
PER: CORAM
None appeared for appellant. On perusal of the records, it is seen that the appellant is unrepresented for the last several occasions, despite notice.
(Order dictated and pronounced in the court)
(AJAY SHARMA) Member (Judicial)
(C J MATHEW) Member (Technical)
mk
2
IIC LIMITED
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX-NASHIK
MATHEW
AJAY SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal in a central excise matter before CESTAT.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
