The appellant submitted extracts from the State Value Ledger to prove discharge of liability. The Tribunal held the appeal infructuous in light of this evidence and dismissed it without further proceedings.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA EASTERN ZONAL BENCH : KOLKATA
REGIONAL BENCH - COURT NO.2
Excise Appeal No.76348 of 2017
(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No.E/76348/2017 dated 31.03.2017 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise(Appeals), bbsr)
M/s HINDALCO Industries Ltd
(Hirakud Complex, At/P.O.-Hirakud, Dist-Sambalpur-768016, Odisga)
Appellant
VERSUS
Commr. of CGST & Central Excise, Rourkela
Respondent
APPEARANCE
Mr. Vasudev, Advocate, for the appellant Mr. S.Dey, Authorized Representative, for the respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE SHRI R. MURALIDHAR, MEMBER(JUDICIAL) HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV TANDON, MEMBER(TECHNICAL)
FINAL ORDER NO. -76690/2025
Date of Hearing : 03.07.2025 Date of Decision : 03.07.2025
Per : R. MURALIDHAR :
The appellant has produced copies of SVLDRS-1 & SVLDRS-4, as proof for discharging of their liability. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
(Pronounced and dictated in the open court)
Sd/Sd/- (Rajeev Tandon) (R. Muralidhar) Member (Technical) Member (Judicial)
SB
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal becomes infructuous upon production of evidentiary documents by the appellant?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s HINDALCO Industries Ltd
Commr. of CGST & Central Excise, Rourkela
R. MURALIDHAR
RAJEEV TANDON
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal in a central excise matter before CESTAT.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
