The Central Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal as withdrawn upon acceptance of a settlement order passed under the Settlement Act by the learned counsel.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn following settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
PRINCIPAL BENCH – COURT NO. I
CENTRAL SALES TAX APPEAL NO. 81 OF 2016
(Arising out of order dated 18.03.2016 passed by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal at Mumbai in VAT Second Appeal No. 160 of 2013 and VAT Appeal No. 411 of 2014)
M/s Thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel ….Appellant India Pvt. Ltd.
Village Vadivarhe, Taluka Igatpuri, Nasik - 422403 (Maharashtra)
VERSUS
1. State of Maharashtra Through Commissioner of Sales Tax, 8th Floor, Vikrikar Bhavan, Mazgaon, Mumbai- 400010
2. Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal 7th Floor, Vikrikar Bhavan, Mazgaon, Mumbai- 400010
3. State of Delhi
Through Commissioner of Trade & Taxes, 3rd Floor, Vyapar Bhavan, I.P. Estate, New Delhi- 110002
4. State of Madhya Pradesh
5. State of Haryana
Through Excise & Taxation Commmissioner, Vanjiya Bhavan, Plot No. I-3 Sector-5, Panchkula- 134109
6. State of Karnataka
Through Commissioner of Commercial Taxes 1st Floor, VTK-1, Kalidasa Road, Gandhinagar, Bangalore- 560009
7. State of Tamil Nadu
8. State of Andhra Pradesh
Through Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, C.T. Complex, Nampally, Hyderabad- 500001
9. State of Gujarat ……. Respondents Through Commissioner of Sales Tax, Rajya Kar Bhavan, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad- 3800009
APPEARANCE:
Shri S.C. Vaidyanathan, advocate for the appellant
Ms. Rama Ahluwalia, advocate for the State of Maharashtra Shri M.L. Garg, advocate for Delhi Government
Ms. Saumya Sinha and Ms. Pritha Srikumar, advocates for the State of Karnataka
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP GUPTA, PRESIDENT HON'BLE MR. P.V. SUBBA RAO, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Date of Hearing/Decision: 18.10.2024
FINAL ORDER NO. 59381/2024
JUSTICE DILIP GUPTA :
Learned counsel for the appellant has placed an order of settlement under section 13(1) of the Settlement Act. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dictated & pronounced in the open court)
(JUSTICE DILIP GUPTA) PRESIDENT
(P.V. SUBBA RAO) MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Golay
M/s Thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel India Pvt. Ltd.
State of Maharashtra
Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal
State of Delhi
State of Madhya Pradesh
State of Haryana
Dilip Gupta
P.V. Subba Rao
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal in a central sales tax matter before CESTAT.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
