Mumbai bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal as deemed withdrawn under Section 127(6) of the Finance Act, 2019, noting the appellant's settlement under Sabka Vishwas Scheme.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
REGIONAL BENCH
Excise Appeal No. 89822 of 2013
(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. NGP/EXCUS/000/APPL/844-845/13-14 d ated 16.09.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Nagpur.)
Shri Ramdayal ........Appellant C/o M/s. Mahalaxmi Dhatu Udyog Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. C-52, MIDC, Hingna Road, Nagpur – 440 028
VERSUS
Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur
........Respondent
Telangkhedi Road, Civil lines, Post Box No. 81, Nagpur – 440 001
APPERANCE:
None for the Appellant
Shri P.K. Acharya, Superintendent, Authorised Representative for the Respondent
CORAM:
HON’BLE DR. SUVENDU KUMAR PATI, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) HON’BLE MR. ANIL G. SHAKKARWAR, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
FINAL ORDER NO. 86243/2024
Date of Hearing: 18.10.2024 Date of Decision: 18.10.2024
PER: BENCH
None for the Appellant but a letter is received from his learned Counsel with copies of Form No. SVLDRS-1 and Form No. SVLDRS-4 indicating settlement of the dispute under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. Form No. SVLDRS-4 certificate bearing no. LD2512190000047 has been issued to Appellant that confirms nil liability. Main Appellant had already
E/89822/2013
2
settled the dispute under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.
(Pronounced in the open court)
(Dr. Suvendu Kumar Pati) Member (Judicial)
(Anil G. Shakkarwar) Member (Technical)
Prasad
Shri Ramdayal
Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur
DR. SUVENDU KUMAR PATI
ANIL G. SHAKKARWAR
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal in a central excise matter before CESTAT.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
