The tribunal dismissed the first appeal due to default and non-prosecution after repeatedly refusing adjournment requests. The bench held that the appellant lacked interest in pursuing the appeal filed in 2013.
Appeal dismissed for default and non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI REGIONAL BENCH, COURT NO. 5
EXCISE APPEAL NO. 87173 OF 2013
(Arising out of Order-in- Appeal No. BR/5/Th-I/2012 dated 19.12.2012 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai Zone-I, Mumbai.)
M/s. PALLAVI GRAPHICS
Unit No. 69, 4th Floor, Bhandup Industrial Estate, Pannalal Silk Mill Compound, LBS Marg, Bhandup (West) Mumbai-400078.
Appellant
Vs.
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, THANE-I
4th Floor, Navprabhat Chambers, Ranade Road, Dadar (W), Mumbai-400 028.
Respondent
APPERANCE:
Shri Ansh Agal, Advocate for the Appellant Shri L.B.D. Coasta, D.C., Authorised Representative for the Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE Dr. SUVENDU KUMAR PATI, MEMBER ( JUDICIAL ) HON'BLE MR. ANIL.G.SHAKKARWAR, MEMBER ( TECHNICAL )
FINAL ORDER NO. 86226/2024
Date of Hearing: 16.10.2024
PER : BENCH
Learned counsel for the Appellant seeks an adjournment once again in this case on the ground that their arguing counsel Mr. Chirag Shetty is unwell today.
2
E/87173/2013 3. On perusal of orders, it is noticed that on 10.10.2023 learned counsel Mr. Ansh Agal who appears today, took adjournment on the ground that their arguing counsel Mr. Jitendra Motwani is pre-occupied before the Hon’ble Bombay High Court.
(Order pronounced in the open court on 16.10.2024)
(Dr. SUVENDU KUMAR PATI) MEMBER ( JUDICIAL )
(ANIL.G.SHAKKARWAR) MEMBER ( TECHNICAL )
M/s. PALLAVI GRAPHICS
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, THANE-I
SUVENDU KUMAR PATI
ANIL G SHAKKARWAR
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal in a central excise matter before CESTAT.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
