The appellant filed a written request for withdrawal of the appeal. The learned Authorised Representative for the respondent was present. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
WEST ZONAL BENCH, MUMBAI
Customs Appeal No. 87285 of 2019
(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. MUM-CUSTM-AXP-APP-121/19-20 dated 24.05.2019 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai-Zone III.)
M/s Comed Chemicals Ltd.,
........Appellant
Sun Plaza-I, 2nd Floor, Near Vadsar Bridge, Makarpura – G.I.D.C. Road, Vadodara, Gujrat – 390 010.
VERSUS
Commissioner of Customs (Export), ........Respondent Air Cargo Complex, Mumbai.
APPERANCE:
None for the Appellant
Shri D. S. Maan, Deputy Commissioner, Authorised Representative for the Respondent
CORAM:
HON’BLE DR. SUVENDU KUMAR PATI, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
FINAL ORDER NO. A/85879/2022
Date of Hearing: 15.09.2022 Date of Decision: 15.09.2022
Written request for withdrawal of appeal is received by the
Registry with a covering letter of the Appellant company itself.
C / 87285 / 2019
2
3. Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. Suvendu Kumar Pati) Member (Judicial)
Sujeet
M/s Comed Chemicals Ltd.
Commissioner of Customs (Export)
Dr. Suvendu Kumar Pati
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal in a customs matter before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
