The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant appeared unrepresented on the final date of hearing.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to lack of representation on the final date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SZB, CHENNAI
COURT : No. I
APPEAL No. C/40282 of 2022-SM
(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal Seaport C. Cus II No. 738/2021 dated 02.12.2021 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II) Chennai).
Shri Girish Vazirani Appellant M/s. JMD Marketing Pvt. Ltd., Solanki Palace, Off .S.V. Road, Opp. Hanuman Mandir, 5th Road Khar (W), Mumbai-400 052.
Vs.
The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II) Respondent 60, Rajaji Salai, Custom Houe, Chennai-600001.
APPEARANCE
FOR APPELLANT : None FOR RESPONDENT : Shri R. Rajaram, AC, Authorized Representative
CORAM
Hon’ble Shri P. Dinesha, Member (Judicial)
Date of Hearing/Decision: 06.09.2022
FINAL ORDER No. 40315/ 2022
There is no representation even today nor is there any request for adjournment. On the last date of hearing the matter was adjourned to 06.09.2022 as a last chance. In spite of that the appellant remained unrepresented. In view of the above, it appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal and hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(P.DINESHA) MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Shri Girish Vazirani M/s. JMD Marketing Pvt. Ltd.
The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II)
P. Dinesha
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal in a customs matter before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
