The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear before the Tribunal on the hearing date despite multiple notices, with liberty to apply for restoration.
Appeals dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to apply for restoration within 30 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ST/60591-60592/2018
1
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH
REGIONAL BENCH – COURT NO. 1
Service Tax Appeal No. 60591 Of 2018
[Arising out of OIA No. 199/CE/DLH/2014 dated 30.09.2014 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) of Central Excise, Delhi-III]
M/s Sigma Moulds & Stampings Pvt. Ltd. : Appellant (s)
Plot No. 149-151, Sec-5, Imt Manesar, Gurgaon GURUGARM, HARYANA
Vs
CCE & ST- Gurgaon-I : Respondent (s)
PLOT NO.36-37, SECTOR-32,NEAR MEDANTA HOSPITAL GURGAON, HARYANA
With
Service Tax Appeal No. 60592 Of 2018
[Arising out of OIA No. 69/CE/APPL-II/DLH/2015 dated 24.03.2015 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) of Central Excise, Delhi-III]
M/s Sigma Moulds & Stampings Pvt. Ltd. : Appellant (s)
Plot No. 149-151, Sec-5, Imt Manesar, Gurgaon GURUGARM, HARYANA
Vs
CCE & ST- Gurgaon-I : Respondent (s)
PLOT NO.36-37, SECTOR-32,NEAR MEDANTA HOSPITAL GURGAON, HARYANA
APPEARANCE: None for the Appellant Shri Tarun Kumar, Authorised Representative for the Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. ASHOK JINDAL, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
ORDER No.A/60012-60013 / 2020
Date of Hearing:06.01.2020 Date of Decision:06.01.2020
ST/60591-60592/2018
2
Per : Mr. Ashok Jindal
None appeared on behalf of the appellant nor any request for adjournment has been received.
(Dictated & pronounced in the Court)
(Ashok Jindal) MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
G.Y.
M/s Sigma Moulds & Stampings Pvt. Ltd.
CCE & ST-Gurgaon-I
Ashok Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal in a service tax matter before CESTAT.
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
