The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for default as the appellant failed to appear despite notice. The Tribunal invoked the principle that law aids the vigilant.
Appeal dismissed; liberty to recall order granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Appeal No. E/1445/2009
Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad
Appeal No. E/1445/2009
(Arising out of OIA-251/2009-AHD-III-KCG/CE/COMMR-A- dated 21.07.2009 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) of Central Excise-AHMEDABAD-III)
M/s Pharmalab Engineering (india) Pvt Ltd
: Appellant (s)
Vs
CCE – Ahmedabad-iii : Respondent (s)
Represented by:
For Appellant (s) : None For Respondent (s): Shri S. N. Gohil, DR
CORAM : Justice Dr. Satish Chandra, Hon'ble Member (Judicial) Mr. C. J. Methew, Hon’ble Member (Technical)
Date of Hearing/Decision: 23.04.2018
ORDER No. A/10812 / 2018
Per : Justice Dr. Satish Chandra
List revised. In spite of notice, neither anybody appeared for
the assessee-Appellants nor there is any adjournment application on record. Shri S. N. Gohil, learned DR, is present for the Revenue. From the record, it appears that the matter was adjourned time and again at the request of the learned counsel for the assessee-Appellants. Hence, it appears that the assessee-Appellants are not interested to pursue the matter.
2
Appeal No. E/1445/2009
NON DORMIENTIBUS JURA SUB VENIUNT , law helps those who are vigilant
and not those who go to sleep.
to come again for recalling this order subject to satisfying the reason for
the default, but within the prescribed time.
(Dictated & pronounced in the Court)
(C. J. Methew) (Justice Dr. Satish Chandra) Member (Technical) President
G.Y.
M/s Pharmalab Engineering (india) Pvt Ltd
CCE – Ahmedabad-iii
Dr. Satish Chandra
C. J. Methew
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal in a central excise matter before CESTAT.
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
