Manohar Rawat And Laerdal Medical Private Limited & Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In an ordinary application for closure of proceedings, the Competition Commission dismissed the informant's complaint alleging cartelization in a tender. The Bench held that the documents submitted did not prima facie substantiate claims of collusion, bid rigging, or contravention of Section 3, thus closing the matter under Section 26(2).
What did the court decide?
The investigation into the matter was closed and forthwith disposed of.
What the court decided
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Case No. 26 of 2023
In Re:
Manohar Rawat Informant B-253, Ground Floor, near Fire Station, Industrial Area Phase-1, Naraina New Delhi-110028
And
Laerdal Medical Private Limited Opposite Party No. 1 315,3rd Floor, A wing Commercial 1, Kohinoor City Kirol Road, Kurla West Mumbai-400070
Adison Equipment Company Opposite Party No. 2 206, Nilgiri, 9, Barakhamba Road New Delhi-110001
Tulips Global Opposite Party No. 3 28-B Shalimar Bagh New Delhi-110088
Shreya Enterprises Opposite Party No. 4 27, Amar Nagar, Pal Road Jodhpur-342008
CORAM
Ms. Ravneet Kaur Chairperson
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the documents furnished by the informant prima facie substantiate allegations of collusion or cartelization in violation of Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Manohar Rawat
Coram
Ravneet Kaur
Anil Agrawal
Sweta Kakkad
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court