This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
467
ANNEXURE – 19
Summary in terms of Regulation 13(1A) of the Competition Commission of
India (Procedure in regard to the transaction of business relating to
combinations) Regulations, 2011 (as amended)
A. Name of the parties to the combination
Target SPVs of DBL / Target Company
468
The entities listed under (a) to (g) above are collectively referred to as the “ Acquirers ” and AAHPL is individually referred to as the “ Acquirer ”. The entities listed under (i) to (z) above are collectively referred to as “ Target SPVs ”. The entities listed under (i) to (p) above are collectively referred to as the “ Operating Asset SPVs ” and entities listed under (q) to (z) are collectively referred to as the “ Under Construction Assets ”. AAHPL, DBL and the Target SPVs (i.e., the Operating Asset SPVs and Under Construction Assets) are collectively referred to as the “ Parties ”.
B. Nature and purpose of the combination
469
C. Products, services and business(es) of the parties to the combination
Acquirer Group
DBL
Target SPVs
D. Respective markets in which the parties to the combination operate
470
DBL (including its affiliates) and the Target SPVs on the other hand, the Proposed Transaction will not cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India, in any plausible market. Therefore, the relevant product and geographic markets may be left open.
E. Green channel filing
1 issue framed by the court
Notification of proposed combination under Section 6(2) read with Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
