1. Ghcl Textiles Limited, 2. Ghcl Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
GHCL Limited
Annexure 10
Summary of the Proposed Combination
[In terms of Regulation 13(1 A) of the Competition Commission of India (Procedure in regard to the transaction of business relating to combinations), 2011, as amended on 26 November 2020]
A. Name of the parties to the Proposed Combination
GHCL Limited and GHCL Textiles Limited (herein collectively referred to as parties).
- B. The nature and purpose of the Combination
The Board of Directors of the GHCL Limited ('GHCL' or 'Demerged Company'), an Indian public limited company listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and National Stock Exchange (NSE), have approved a Scheme of Arrangement, on 6-December-2021, involving an internal restructuring of its business by way of a demerger of its Spinning division into its wholly owned subsidiary company named GHCL Textiles Limited. ('Resulting Company') - hereinafter referred to as 'Proposed Demerger' or 'Proposed Transaction' or 'Scheme'. The Board of Directors of the GHCL Textiles Limited also approved the Scheme on 6-December-2021.
Pursuant to such Proposed Demerger, the Resulting Company will be engaged in the demerged Spinning business division. Shareholders of GHCL will receive shares in the Resulting Company basis swap ratio of 1: 1 resulting in mirror shareholding pattern of the GHCL and the Resulting Company. The Resulting Company will then not remain a subsidiary of GHCL post the Proposed Demerger, as the pre-demerger capital held by GHCL in the Resulting Company will get cancelled as part of the Scheme.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
GHCL Limited
- applicant
GHCL Textiles Limited
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court