Bablu & Company v. Fatehchand & Company & Others.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Competition Commission of India, relying on prior findings that the alleged disputes did not raise competition concerns, held that the Informant's allegations regarding commission agents in Azadpur Mandi did not reveal any competition issue. The inquiry was closed stating no prima facie case for Sections 3 and 4 contravention.
What did the court decide?
Case closed under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 as no competition issue was found.
What the court decided
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA Case No. 7 of 2019
In Re:
Bablu & Company, B-891 New Subzi Mandi, Azadpur Delhi- 110033.
Informant
And
Fatehchand & Company, B-185, New Subzi Mandi, Azadpur Delhi-110033.
Opposite Party No. 1
Gordhan Das Rajiv Kumar, B- 927-927 New Subzi Mandi, Azadpur Delhi- 110033.
Opposite Party No. 2
Ajay Rajive & Comapny, C-515 New Subzi Mandi, Azadpur Delhi-110033.
Opposite Party No. 3
Jagdish Kumar & Company, A-1185 New Subzi Mandi, Azadpur Delhi-110033.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the alleged conduct of commission agents constitutes abuse of dominant position causing appreciable adverse effect on competition.
Whether competition issues can be made out based solely on disputes over quality, quantity, delivery, and payment in a regulated market.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bablu & Company
- respondent
Fatehchand & Company
- respondent
Gordhan Das Rajiv Kumar
- respondent
Ajay Rajive & Company
- respondent
Jagdish Kumar & Company
- respondent
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court