Denso Corporation, Japan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Competition Commission of India considered an application by DENSO Corporation for acquiring an additional 7% shareholding and a director nomination right in Subros Limited. The Commission found no competition concerns and approved the combination under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act, 2002.
What did the court decide?
The Proposed Combination of acquiring 7% shareholding and one director nomination right is approved under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act, 2002.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Fair Competition For Greater Good
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
(Combination Registration No. C-2018/11/614)
22nd November, 2018
Notice under Section 6(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 given by DENSO Corporation
CORAM:
Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta Chairperson
Mr. Augustine Peter Member
Mr. U. C. Nahta Member
Legal Representatives of the parties: Khaitan & Co.
Order under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act, 2002
- On 06.11.2018, the Competition Commission of India ( Commission ) received a notice under Section 6(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 ( Act ) given by DENSO Corporation ( DENSO / Acquirer ).
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the proposed combination of increased shareholding and director nomination by DENSO in Subros is likely to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India?
Parties & counsel
- respondent
Competition Commission of India
- applicant
DENSO Corporation
- respondent
Subros Limited
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court