Dr Ravi Bhushan Sharma v. Toyota kiroskar Motor Pvt. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Competition Commission of India examined an information alleging abuse of dominance under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 regarding alleged service deficiencies in SUV sales and spare parts availability. The Commission found no dominance and dismissed the case.
What did the court decide?
Matter closed under provisions of Section 26(2) of the Act; no contravention of Section 4 made out.
What the court decided
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA Case No. 92 of 2016
In re :
Dr. Ravi Bhushan Sharma 2H/26, Gandhi Nagar, Kankarbagh, Badarpur, Patna, Bihar - 800026 Informant
And
Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd. 10th Floor, Canberra Tower, U. B. City, No.24, Vittal Mallya Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka - 560001 Opposite Party
CORAM
Mr. S. L. Bunker Member
Mr. Sudhir Mital Member
Mr. Augustine Peter Member
Case No. 92 of 2016 Page 1 of 6
Mr. U. C. Nahta
Member
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd. is dominant in the market of sports utility vehicles in India.
Whether the conduct of Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd. amounts to an abuse of dominance under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dr. Ravi Bhushan Sharma
- respondent
Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd.
Coram
Mr. S. L. Bunker Member
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- CCI
- Decided on
- · December
- Case no.
- 92/2016
- Topic
- Consumer Protection
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court