Mr. Sumit Kumar v. Kamp Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Competition Commission examined an information alleging anti-competitive practices and abuse of dominance by KAMP Developers Pvt. Ltd regarding a residential project with false claims of land approval. The Commission found no anti-competitive agreement and no evidence of dominant position in the Delhi residential real estate market.
What did the court decide?
The matter is closed under Section 26(2) of the Act as no case was made out under Sections 3 or 4.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Case No. 26 of 2016
In Re:
Mr. Sumit Kumar House No. 125, Village & PO Mudhela Kalan, Najafgarh, New Delhi- 110073 ....Informant
And
KAMP Developers Pvt. Ltd Represented by its Managing Director, S-1, II Floor, Centric Plaza, Sector-11, Pkt-4, Plot No. 8, Dwarka, New Delhi- 110075 ....Opposite Party
CORAM
Mr. Devender Kumar Sikri Chairperson
Case No. 26 of 2016
Page 1 of 8
Mr. S. L. Bunker
Member
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the conduct of floating residential projects with alleged misrepresentation of land acquisition under Land Pooling Policy constitutes an anti-competitive agreement under Section 3 of the Act.
Whether the respondent holds a dominant position in the relevant market under Section 2(t) and 2(r) of the Act.
Whether abuse of dominant position under Section 4 of the Act is applicable in the absence of dominance.
Parties & counsel
- respondent
KAMP Developers Pvt. Ltd
- petitioner
Mr. Sumit Kumar
Coram
Devender Kumar Sikri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- CCI
- Decided on
- · June
- Case no.
- 26/2016
- Topic
- Consumer Protection
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court