Jointly by Aircel Limited, Dishnet Wireless Limited, Reliance Communications Limited and Reliance Telecom Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Summary of the Proposed Combination
[In terms of Regulation 13 (1B) of the Competition Commission of India (Procedure in regard to the transaction of business relating to combinations), 2011, as amended on 7 January 2016]
A. Name of the parties to the Proposed Combination
- Aircel Limited (“ Aircel ”), Dishnet Wireless Limited (“ Dishnet ”), Reliance Communications Limited (“ RCOM ”) and Reliance Telecom Limited (“ RTL ”).
B. Type of the Proposed Combination
- The proposed combination involves the merger of the RCOM Wireless Business (i.e., RCOM Wireless Business 1, RCOM Wireless Business 2 and RTL Wireless Business, as defined in the Notice), which presently comprises 98,709,655 customers across 22 telecom circles offering 4G services on a pan-India basis on 800 MHz spectrum band through 4G spectrum sharing agreement with Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited, 3G services in 13 telecom circles and 2G services in 19 telecom circles for data and voice services, with the existing business carried out by Aircel and Dishnet (“ Aircel Business ”) which presently comprises 88,934,189 customers across 22 telecom circles offering 3G services in 13 telecom circles and 2G services in all 22 telecom circles for data and voice services, thereby creating a business in
which RCOM, on the one hand, and Global Communication Services Holdings Limited, including Sindya Securities & Investments Private Limited, on the other hand, shall have equal equity participation on completion of the proposed combination (“ Proposed Combination ”).
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court