Mr. Gajinder Singh Kohli v. Genius Propbuild Private Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The Competition Commission examined an information alleging abuse of dominant position by Genius Propbuild Private Limited regarding a real estate project in Bhiwadi. The Commission defined the relevant market but found the Opposite Party did not enjoy a dominant position.
What the court decided
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Case No. 15 of 2016
In Re
Mr. Gajinder Singh Kohli Informant And Genius Propbuild Private Limited Opposite Party CORAM: Mr. S. L. Bunker Member Mr. Sudhir Mital Member Mr. Augustine Peter Member Mr. U. C. Nahta Member Dr. M. S. Sahoo Member Mr. Justice G. P. Mittal Member Appearances: For the Informant : Mr. Dalip Singh, Advocate Mr. Gajinder Singh Kohli For the Opposite Party : Ms. Mansha Anand, Advocate Mr. Nikhil Mathur, Advocate
Case No. 15 of 2016 Page 1 of 7
Order under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002
- The present information has been filed under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ Act’ ) by Mr. Gajinder Singh Kohli (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ Informant ’) against Genius Propbuild Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘ OP ’) alleging, inter alia, contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act.
- As per information, the Informant had booked a residential apartment in a group housing residential complex, known as , “Avalon Rangoli” developed by OP in Karampur village, tehsil Tijara, district Alwar, Rajasthan.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Genius Propbuild Private Limited enjoys a dominant position in the market for provision of services for development and sale of residential apartments in Bhiwadi and nearby areas.
Whether the allegations of abuse of dominant position can be sustained against the Opposite Party.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mr. Gajinder Singh Kohli
Coram
S. L. Bunker
Sudhir Mital
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court