Smt. Sarita Punia w/o Shri P. D. Punia v. Tulip Housing Private Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The Competition Commission of India examined an allegation by a consumer against Tulip Housing Private Limited for abusing dominant position and delaying possession of a flat. The Commission defined the relevant market but found no dominant position was held by the developer, thus no case of contravention was made out under Section 4.
What the court decided
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Case No. 110 of 2015
In Re
Smt. Sarita Punia w/o Shri P. D. Punia, R/o HEWO Flat No. 61,
Sector-16A, Faridabad, Haryana. Informant
And
Tulip Housing Private Limited, Through its Director/M.D./Auth. Sign.
Registered Office:
S-12, Sector-8, Jasola Vihar, New Delhi. Opposite Party
CORAM:
Mr. Devender Kumar Sikri Chairperson
Mr. S. L. Bunker Member
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the alleged delay in possession by the real estate developer amounts to abuse of dominant position under Section 4 of the Competition Act.
Whether the respondent enjoys a dominant position in the relevant market for provision of services for development and sale of residential apartments in Faridabad.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sarita Punia
- respondent
Tulip Housing Private Limited
Coram
Devender Kumar Sikri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court