Shri Raghavendra Singh v. RelianceIndustries Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Competition Commission closed an information filed by a dealership firm alleging abuse of dominant position and contravention of Section 4 by Reliance Industries regarding retail outlet suspension. The Commission found Reliance did not hold dominance in the relevant market.
What did the court decide?
Information ordered to be closed forthwith under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA Case No. 91 of 2015
In Re:
Shri Raghavendra Singh Authorized Representative AnjaniSut Fuel, “Triveni”, Bishnupur Road, Jhumri-Telaiya, Koderma - 825409
Informant
And
RelianceIndustries Ltd. Maker Chambers IV, 3rd Floor, 222, Nariman Point, Post Box - 11717, Mumbai - 400021 Opposite Party
CORAM:
Mr. Ashok Chawla Chairperson
Mr. S. L. Bunker Member
Mr. Augustine Peter Member
Mr. U. C. Nahta Member
Mr. M. S. Sahoo Member
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners firm was aggrieved with the closure/suspension of its retail outlet and alleged contravention of Section 4 of the Competition Act by the opposite party.
Whether the opposite party holds a dominant position in the relevant market for the retail sale of petroleum products in India.
Whether the information filed regarding alleged abuse of dominant position and contravention of Section 4 is maintainable.
Coram
Ashok Chawla
S. L. Bunker
Augustine Peter
U. C. Nahta
M. S. Sahoo
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court