Mr. Vijay Kapoor v. Dlf Universal Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
In Re Mr. Vijay Kapoor v DLF Universal Limited, the Competition Commission of India, hearing an information alleging abuse of dominant position in the Gurgaon residential real estate market, found prima facie evidence of such abuse. The Commission ordered the Director General to investigate the matter within sixty days.
What did the court decide?
The Director General is directed to cause an investigation into the matter and complete it within sixty days.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Case No. 84 of 2014
In Re:
Mr. Vijay Kapoor Address: C-22, Fateh Nagar, P.O. Tilak Nagar, New Delhi – 110018 Informant
And
DLF Universal Limited DLF Centre, Sansad Marg, New Delhi
Opposite Party
CORAM
Mr. Ashok Chawla Chairperson
Mr. S .L. Bunker Member
Mr. Sudhir Mital Member
Mr. Augustine Peter Member
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the conduct of the opposite party, including imposing one-sided terms and hidden costs in the Agreement and coercing payment under threat of forfeiture, prima facie amounts to abuse of dominan
Whether the relevant market for provision of services for development and sale of residential units in Gurgaon can be presumed without a specific proposal from the informant based on previous orders.
Whether an order directing the Director General to investigate the contravention of Section 4 is appropriate under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mr. Vijay Kapoor
- respondent
DLF Universal Limited
Coram
Ashok Chawla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page
- Order 2
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court