Rooster Info. Pvt. Ltd. v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Competition Commission of India examined an information alleging abuse of dominant position and anti-competitive agreements by Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. regarding GPS installations on transporters. Finding no cogent material to prove appreciable adverse effect on competition and that the opposite party held an insignificant market share, the Commission found no prima facie case and closed the m
What did the court decide?
Matter closed; no order against the opposite party.
What the court decided
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA Case No. 22 of 2015
In Re:
Rooster Info. Pvt. Ltd. Through Mr. Piyush Agarwal, Managing Director 252A, Mohit House, Shahpur Jat, New Delhi
Informant
And
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. 1, Nelson Mandela Marg, Vasant Kunj-II, New Delhi
Opposite Party
CORAM
Mr. Ashok Chawla Chairperson
Mr. S. L. Bunker Member
Mr. Sudhir Mital Member
Mr. Augustine Peter Member
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the alleged conduct of the opposite party causes appreciable adverse effect on competition under section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002.
Whether the opposite party holds a dominant position in the relevant market to attract investigation under section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.
Whether a prima facie case of contravention of sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 is made out against the opposite party.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rooster Info. Pvt. Ltd.
Coram
Ashok Chawla
S. L. Bunker
Sudhir Mital
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court