Mr. Ravinder Pal Singh v. Bptp Limited & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Competition Commission analyzed an information alleging abuse of dominant position by a real estate developer. The Commission determined the relevant market and found the opposite party was not dominant. Consequently, no case was made out under Section 4, and the matter was closed.
What did the court decide?
The matter closed under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 with no case made out for contravention of Section 4.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Case No. 14 of 2015
In Re:
Mr. Ravinder Pal Singh Flat No. 305, Orion Tower, Omaxe Heights, Sector-86, Faridabad, Haryana Informant
And
BPTP Limited & Others M-11, Middle Circle, Connaught Circus, New Delhi Opposite Party
CORAM
Mr. Ashok Chawla Chairperson
Mr. S. L. Bunker Member
Mr. Sudhir Mital Member
Mr. Augustine Peter Member
Mr. U. C. Nahta Member
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the alleged conduct of the opposite party constitutes an abuse of dominant position under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.
Whether the opposite party occupies a dominant position in the relevant market for provision of services for development and sale of residential apartments in Faridabad.
Whether the investigation under the Competition Act, 2002 should be continued or closed given the prima facie finding.
Coram
Ashok Chawla
S. L. Bunker
Sudhir Mital
Augustine Peter
U. C. Nahta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court