Shri Dominic Da'Silva v. M/s Vatika Group.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Competition Commission of India assessed an allegation of contravention of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 by a real estate developer. The Commission defined the relevant market but found no prima facie evidence of dominant position, thereby closing the inquiry.
What did the court decide?
null
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Case No. 101 of 2014
In Re:
Shri Dominic Da’Silva Flat No. 402, IC Colony, 5th Cross Road, Borivali (West) Mumbai - 400103 Informant
And
M/s Vatika Group Flat No. 621A, 6th Floor Devika Towers 6 Nehra Place, New Delhi - 110019 Opposite Party
CORAM
Mr. Ashok Chawla Chairperson
Mr. S. L. Bunker Member
Mr. Sudhir Mital Member
Mr. Augustine Peter Member Appearances: Shri Dilip Kumar, Advocate
C. No. 101 of 2014
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Opposite Party abused its dominant position in the market for services for development and sale of commercial units in Gurgaon.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shri Dominic Da'Silva
- respondent
M/s Vatika Group
Coram
Ashok Chawla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court