Anil Gambhir v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Competition Commission of India examined allegations that the Central Public Works Department abused its dominant position by restricting tenders to specialized contractors. The Commission found no prima facie case of dominance and closed the proceedings under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002.
What did the court decide?
Proceedings of the case under Section 26(2) of the Act were closed.
What the court decided
Case No.11/2013
In Re:
27 May, 2013
Anil Gambhir Informant r/o G-53, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi
And
The Union of India Opposite Party Through the Director General, CPWD CPWD, NirmanBhawan, New Delhi
CORAM:
Mr. Ashok Chawla Chairperson
Dr.GeetaGouri Member
Mr.AnuragGoel Member Mr. M. L. Tayal Member
Mr. Justice (Retd.) S. N. Dhingra Member
Mr. S.L. Bunker Member
Present :Shri R. Rajappan, Advocate for the informant.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the complainant established a prima facie case that the respondent held a dominant position in the relevant market.
Whether there was any prima facie case of abuse of dominant position under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.
Parties & counsel
- respondent
The Union of India
- petitioner
Anil Gambhir
Coram
Ashok Chawla
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court