Disposed¶16

Rajeev Sinha v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC12 May 2026WPO/654/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Calcutta High Court Original Side, WPO/654/2025, Rajeev Sinha v. State of West Bengal & Ors. (as printed), decided 12.05.2026 by Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.: illegal construction complaint, KMC report dated 02.09.2025 confirming construction per three sanctioned plans (12.09.2022, 31.08.2023, 17.05.2024) for G+IV residential building, departmental inspection, premises occupied, writ petition disposed as nothing survives, municipality's report retained on record.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; writ petition disposed of with the municipality's report dated 2nd September 2025 retained on record. ¶16

Rajeev Sinha Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors. — Calcutta HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

OD-07

¶2

WPO/654/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE

¶3

Rajeev Sinha Versus

¶4

The State of West Bentgal & Ors.

¶5

Before:

¶6

The Hon’ble Justice RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY Date: 12^th May 2026

¶7

Appearance: Mr. Amish Roy Advocate Mr. Soujanyo Pattanayak, Advocate for the petitioner

¶8

Mr. Gopal Ch, Das, Advocate Ms. Ananya Das, Advocate for the KMC

¶9

Mr. S. R. Saha, Advocate For respondent no.8

¶10

Complaining illegal construction at premises no.4, Madan Chatterjee Lane, Ward No.41, Borough – V, Kolkata and the failure on the part of the municipal authorities to dispose of the petitioner’s complaint dated 21^st May 2025 appearing at page 20 of the writ petition, the instant writ petition has been filed.

¶11

According the learned advocate representing the private respondent, the construction work carried out is in accordance with the sanctioned building plan.

¶12

The municipality is represented by Mr. Das learned advocate. By placing before this Court a report dated 2^nd September 2025 he

¶13

¶14

would submit that the construction work carried out at the said premises is in accordance with three several reconstruction sanctioned building plans dated 12^th September 2022, 31^st August 2023 and 17^th May 2024 which is for G+IV storeyed residential building. According to the report, the construction was executed under the supervision of Mr. Monojendra Dutta, E.S.E. & L.B.S. Departmental inspection revealed that the reconstructional work is completed in accordance with the sanctioned plan and the same is occupied by the occupants. The report is duly signed amongst others by Executive Engineer(C)Bldg/Br-V dated 2^nd September 2025.

¶15

Having regard to the disclosure made in Court, I am of the view that nothing survives in the writ petition.

¶16

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of by retaining the report of the municipality on record.

¶17

(RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J.)

¶18

R. Bose

Rajeev Sinha v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajeev Sinha v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sultan Khichi Vs Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Subhasish Singha and Ors. Vs Burdwan Municipality and Ors.

Bidisha Rakshit and Anr. Vs Bidhannagar Municipality and Ors.

Pramila Shah and Ors. Vs Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Rajeev Sinha Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Rajeev Sinha Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.