Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on the petitioner's prayer, with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action.
Liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition on the self same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sl.11 15.01.2026 Court No.19 BP
WPA 567 of 2026
Sarwar Ahmed Khan -versus-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Ms. Sulagna Bhattacharya ..for the petitioner
Mr. Chandi Charan De, Ld. Addl. Govt. Pleader Ms. Saswati Chatterjee ..for the State Mr. Sanjay Saha Mr. Raju Mondal ..for the respondent no.4 Mr. Md. T.M. Siddiqui, Sr. Advocate Ms. Richa Pramanik ..for the respondent nos. 5,6 and 9
The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that she has received instructions from her client to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to move afresh on the self same cause of action. The written instruction given by the petitioner to his learned advocate on record is taken on record.
The State, the Corporation and the private respondent nos. 5, 6 and 9 are represented by their respective learned advocates.
On the prayer of the learned advocate for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file afresh on the self same cause of action.
(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)
Sarwar Ahmed Khan
The State of West Bengal
Respondent no. 4
Respondent no. 5
Respondent no. 6
Respondent no. 9
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
