Sahida Bibi v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Section 18 Land Acquisition Act 1894 reference application; Collector North 24 Parganas at Barasat; failure to refer land acquisition dispute to competent court despite timely filing; writ petition disposed with direction to act within eight weeks upon satisfaction that application is in form and within time; 2nd respondent empowered to call for documents; Sahida Bibi; State of West Bengal; Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.; WPA 5328 of 2026; affidavit of service taken on record.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of by directing the Collector, North 24 Parganas at Barasat to consider the petitioner's application under Section 18 of the 1894 Act and take steps in accordance with law if it is in form and was filed within the stipulated period; upon such satisfaction, the 2nd respondent to take necessary steps in terms of Section 18 as expeditiously as possible, positively within eight weeks of receipt of a server copy of the order with a complete copy of the application; liberty to the 2nd respondent to call for documents from the petitioner.