Dismissed

Eastern Paper Mills Limited and Anr. v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC3 Feb 2026WPA/23968/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order on WPA 23968 of 2025 disposed of a petition seeking implementation of a prior court order regarding property protection. The court held that the order was already being implemented by police, leading to disposal with no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed in the sense that no further direction is required as the impugned order is being implemented; no order as to costs.

Eastern Paper Mills Limited and Anr. Vs the… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Calcutta HC (2026)

¶1

February 3, 2026 (17 & 18) ARDR

¶2

WPA 23968 of 2025

¶3

Eastern Paper Mills Limited & anr.

¶4

Vs.

¶5

The State of West Bengal & ors.

¶6

With

¶7

WPA 23475 of 2025

¶8

¶9

CAN 1 of 2025

¶10

Eastern Paper Mills Limited & anr. Vs. The State of West Bengal & ors.

¶11

Sr. Adv. Debasish Kundu (through VC), Adv. Atarup Banerjee, Adv. Arindam Sen, Adv. Sourav Basu, Adv. Samit Bhanja, Adv. Rajdeep Pramanik, Adv. Payel Maji,

¶12

…for the petitioners in both matters.

¶13

Adv. Pulak Ranjan Mondal, Adv. Bandana Mondal,

¶14

…for added respondent (Ratna Bose).

¶15

Adv. Shantanu Kr. Mitra, Adv. Subhadip Biswas,

¶16

…for the State in WPA 23968 of 2025.

¶17

Adv. Swapan Kumar Dutta, Adv. Tirthankar Dey,

¶18

...for the State in WPA 23475 of 2025.

¶19

Exception used by the petitioner is taken on record.

¶20

In WPA 23968 of 2025 the sole prayer of the petitioner is for a direction upon the police authority to implement the order passed by this Court in WPA 23475 of 2025 on 25^th September, 2025 directing the police to ensure that so far as the property referred to in the said writ petition was concerned, the same would not interfered with by any third party.

¶21

¶22

It appears from the report submitted by the State and is also submitted on behalf of the State that the said order is being implemented by the police authority continuously. The police authority is keeping sharp watch on the property to restrain any third party from entering thereto.

¶23

In view of the above, nothing further remains to be dealt with in the writ petition being WPA 23968 of 2025. The same is accordingly disposed of.

¶24

There shall however, be no order as to costs.

¶25

Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the petition are deemed not to have been admitted.

¶26

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

¶27

WPA 23475 of 2025 is detagged from WPA 23968 of 2025.

¶28

WPA 23475 of 2025 shall appear under the heading <Motion= on 10^th March, 2026.

¶29

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)

Eastern Paper Mills Limited and Anr. v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Eastern Paper Mills Limited and Anr. v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Yasin and Anr. Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Maibub Mallick @ Mehebub Mallik Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Naren Makal Vs the State of West Bengtal and Ors.

Rasid Khan and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Bappaditya Mondal Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Susmita Sarkar Roy Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.