A public interest litigation was permitted to be withdrawn on the petitioner's prayer, with liberty to file afresh with better particulars.
Liberty to file the PIL afresh with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27.07.2026 Item No.05 Court No.01 Avijit Mitra
WPA (P) 120 of 2026
Sujay Bandyopadhyay - Versus – State of West Bengal & ors.
Mr. Sujay Bandyopadhyay
… petitioner in-person Mr. Ajit Kumar Mishra, AGP, Mr. Gopal Krishna Sarkar, Mr. Milind Mohul Ghosh ….for the State Mr. Arindam Chandra, Mr. Atish Ghosh, Ms. Antara Dey, Ms. Neha Gupta ….for the respondent nos. 12 to 14
On the prayer of the petitioner appearing in-person, the Public Interest Litigation being WPA (P) 120 of 2026, is dismissed as ‘ withdrawn ’ with liberty to file afresh, with better particulars.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, A.C.J.)
Sujay Bandyopadhyay
State of West Bengal
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
