Testamentary jurisdiction application concerning a deceased person's estate, earlier displayed in the warning list and later placed on the peremptory list, drew no appearance from or for either side; the High Court at Calcutta dismissed the matter for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-23
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA TESTAMANTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE
PLA/75/2012 IA NO: GA/3/2017(Old No: GA/2760/2017)
IN THE GOODS OF :
BANU YAKUBBHAI CALCUTTAWALA (DECEASED)
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY Date : 12TH FEBRUARY, 2026.
The Court:- The above matter had been displayed in the warning list of this Hon’ble Court on and from 13th January, 2026 and appeared in the peremptory list on this day i.e. on 12th February, 2026. However, none appeared to represent either of the parties.
Let the matter be dismissed for default.
(ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY, J.)
JM
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a testamentary application concerning a deceased person's estate should remain alive when neither side appeared despite warning-list and peremptory-list display.
Banu Yakubbhai Calcuttawala
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
