Swastika Guha and Ors. v. Nirmal Kumar Sen and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Jurisdiction - pecuniary jurisdiction - appeal against impugned order not maintainable before this Court as District Court has pecuniary jurisdiction per valuation of suit - condonation application redundant - appeal and interlocutory applications disposed of with liberty to re-file before appropriate jurisdictional court - retrieval of certified copy permitted on furnishing photocopy. Parties: Swastika Guha and others v. Nirmal Kumar Sen and another. Counsel: Anirban Roy for appellants. Bench: Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.; Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J. Decided April 9, 2026.
What did the court decide?
Appellants given liberty to prefer an appeal against the impugned order before the appropriate court having jurisdiction; Advocate-on-record granted leave to take back the certified copy of the impugned order from the Department upon furnishing a photocopy for the records.